NOMAD sökresultat

  1. NOMAD – 22(4), 2017

    Volume 22, No 4, December 2017

    Volume 22, No 4, December 2017

    e-NOMAD

    [PDF] displays the full text pdf. The two most recent volumes are password protected. Use ”Open access” in the menu for full text of older articles.

    Editorial

    Simon Goodchild and Barbara Jaworski

    Developing practice through research into university mathematics education

    [PDF]

    Angeliki Mali and Georgia Petropoulou

    Characterising undergraduate mathematics teaching across settings and countries: an analytical framework

    [PDF]

    Suela Kacerja, Toril Eskeland Rangnes, Rune Herheim, Meinrad Pohl, Inger Elin Lilland and Ragnhild Hansen

    Stimulating critical mathematical discussions in teacher education: use of indices such as the BMI as entry points

    [PDF]

    Mervi A. Asikainen, Antti Viholainen, Mika Koponen and Pekka E. Hirvonen

    Finnish entry-level students’ views of teacher knowledge and the characteristics of a good mathematics teacher

    [PDF]

    Sinéad Breen, Niclas Larson, Ann O’Shea and Kerstin Pettersson

    A study of students’ concept images of inverse functions in Ireland and Sweden

    [PDF]

    Margrethe Naalsund and Joakim Skogholt

    Oral presentations as a tool for promoting metacognitive regulation in real analysis

    [PDF]

    Stephanie Treffert-Thomas, Olov Viirman, Paul Hernandez-Martinez and Yuriy Rogovchenko

    Mathematics lecturers’ views on the teaching of mathematical modelling

    [PDF]

    Ian Jones and David Sirl

    Peer assessment of mathematical understanding using comparative judgement

    [PDF]

    Barbro Grevholm

    Bokanmälan

    Innehåll: JH

    Skapad: 2018-01-04 kl. 00:00

  2. NOMAD 22(4), 2017

    Oral presentations as a tool for promoting metacognitive regulation in real analysis

    Margrethe Naalsund and Joakim Skogholt

    Abstract
    Real Analysis is for many students their first proof-based mathematics course, and many find it challenging. This paper studies how oral presentations of mathematical problems for peers can contribute to students’ metacognitive reflections. The paper discusses several aspects tied to preparing for, and carrying out, oral presentations, that seem to spur important sub-components of metacognitive regulation such as planning, monitoring, and evaluating. Thoughtful guidance from an expert encouraged the students to further monitor their cognition, and evaluate their arguments and cognitive processes when expressing their reasoning to their peers.

    Margrethe Naalsund
    Margrethe Naalsund is associate professor in Mathematics Education. She works at Faculty of Science and Technology (Section for Learning and Teacher Education) at Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU). Her main research interests are learning and teaching algebra at primary and secondary school, and learning and teaching real analysis at university level.

    Joakim Skogholt
    Joakim Skogholt is PhD-student in Mathematics. He works at Faculty of Science and Technology (Section for Applied Mathematics) at Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU). His main research interests are applied linear algebra, and learning and teaching real analysis at university level.

    Skapad: 2018-01-04 kl. 00:00

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!