NOMAD 19(1), 2014

Skapad: 2014-03-04. Ändrad: 2014-03-04  

NOMAD 19(1), 2014

A comparison of three frameworks for measuring knowledge for teaching mathematics

Hege Kaarstein

Abstract

This paper presents a comparison of three different frameworks used in research projects aimed at measuring knowledge for teaching mathematics. As the included cases all build on Shulman’s theoretical framework for teacher knowledge, in which the categories subject matter content knowledge (CK) and pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) are central, his framework was used as a reference. To enable comparison across the frameworks, each framework’s categories were analysed and organized taxonomically. The results indicate agreement on a superordinate level. However, important differences were found in the operationalisation of the basic level cat- egories mathematics CK and mathematics PCK. As the basic level normally represents clear communication of categories, this paper suggests that more attention to the operationalisation of basic level categories is needed.

Hege Kaarstein

Hege Kaarstein is a PhD student at the Department of Teacher Education and School Research, University of Oslo. Her focus is mathematical knowledge for teaching – the concept, its categorization and operationalization.